Editorial

On this day, October 31, the nation bows in solemn remembrance of Indira Gandhi, a leader whose life embodied strength, conviction, and sacrifice. Her martyrdom in 1984 was not merely the tragic end of a Prime Minister—it was the silencing of one of the most formidable voices in India’s modern history.

Indira Gandhi’s political journey was one of courage under fire. She inherited a young nation still grappling with identity and direction and steered it through turbulent decades with unyielding resolve. Her leadership during the 1971 Bangladesh Liberation War, which redrew South Asia’s map and established India as a decisive regional power, remains a defining moment in our national narrative. Her famous declaration, “I am not a person to be pressured,” reflected an iron will that refused to bend before external or internal challenges.

Yet, her legacy is complex. The Emergency (1975–77) remains a contested chapter, raising enduring questions about the balance between authority and democracy. But even her critics acknowledge her unmatched political instinct and her ability to command both respect and fear. She was, above all, a leader who believed in action, not hesitation.

Forty-one years later, Indira Gandhi’s life continues to evoke debate, admiration, and introspection. In an era when political conviction often yields to populism, her unwavering sense of purpose stands out as a reminder that leadership demands both strength and sacrifice. The “Iron Lady of India” remains etched in history not only for what she achieved but for the indomitable spirit with which she served her nation—till her last breath.

On her martyr day, we remember not only the leader she was but the resilience she inspired in the idea of India itself.

The shifting ground of the Russia–Ukraine War is increasingly showing up as a proxy theatre not only between nations but between the wills of two very different leaders—Donald Trump and Vladimir Putin. At its core lies the question: who steers the endgame? And at what cost?

Trump, having returned to office with a promise to end the war, has since published contradictory signals. On one hand he declares a “very good chance” of peace after talks with Putin. On the other, he has embraced bellicose posturing—announcing renewed U.S. nuclear testing, for example, in response to Russian weapons testing.

Putin, meanwhile, leverages both battlefield gains and diplomatic ambivalence to reinforce Russia’s bargaining power. His recent announcement of a new nuclear-capable torpedo underscores the seriousness of the threat. He also exploits divisions between the U.S. and its European allies, as observers note that Russia is “capitalising” on Trump’s overtures to drive a wedge in the Western alliance.



The risk is that the war becomes not simply the Ukraine conflict, but a wider theatre of great-power competition, where treaty norms bend, alliances quiver and civilians pay the price. Trump’s push for a quick deal has raised alarm among Kyiv’s backers, who fear big concessions to Moscow.

In this tense moment, the role of the U.S. could pivot from staunch defender of Ukraine to broker of settlement—one that may freeze the conflict rather than decisively end it. If so, the terms of that freeze, the territories conceded, the guarantees given, will shape the balance of power for decades. Europe must stay alert. America must choose clarity over contradiction. And Ukraine, whose fate remains most directly threatened, must not be sidelined in the pursuit of great-power spectacle.

Indian women’s cricket scripted another golden chapter on Thursday, defeating Australia by five wickets to storm into the final of the championship. It was not just a victory—it was a statement. The star of the night, Jemimah Rodrigues, delivered a breathtaking innings of 127 runs off 134 balls, guiding India to a thrilling win and proving once again that grace and grit can coexist on the cricket field.

Australia, known for their dominance in women’s cricket, looked in control for most of the game. But Jemimah’s calm determination and clinical shot selection turned the tide. Supported ably by the middle order, she anchored India’s chase with maturity beyond her years. The innings was a masterclass in timing, temperament, and tactical brilliance.

This win means more than a berth in the final—it symbolizes the rising power and confidence of Indian women’s cricket. The team has shown not only skill but an unshakable belief in their ability to take on the world’s best. Their journey reflects the changing landscape of Indian sports, where women are no longer in the shadows but are leading from the front.

As India prepares for the Sunday final against South Africa, the nation’s hopes soar high. The triumph over Australia is already an inspiring milestone—reminding us that every cover drive, every run saved, and every cheer from the stands echoes a larger truth: women’s cricket is not just catching up—it has arrived.

Win or lose the final, the Indian women have already won hearts and rewritten history. Their courage, composure, and class promise a bright future for the game and a new chapter of pride for Indian sport.

• SAS Kirmani